top of page



Articles On The Topic: "Arma"

The foundational articles for the A-R Online Music Anthology cover the main style periods of Western Art Music, with each period containing articles from each of the five sections: Surveys/Overview; Genres & Forms; Music Theory; Major Composers; and Significant Works. Other articles are planned for release in the future.

Articles on the topic: "Arma"

Download File:

In the next couple of articles we are going to discuss three types of model, namely the Autoregressive (AR) model of order $p$, the Moving Average (MA) model of order $q$ and the mixed Autogressive Moving Average (ARMA) model of order $p, q$. These models will help us attempt to capture or "explain" more of the serial correlation present within an instrument. Ultimately they will provide us with a means of forecasting the future prices.

However, as with all QuantStart articles, I want to build up to these models from simpler versions so that we can see how each new variant changes our predictive ability. Despite the fact that AR, MA and ARMA are relatively simple time series models, they are the basis of more complicated models such as the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and the GARCH family. Hence it is important that we study them.

I mentioned in previous articles that we would eventually need to consider how to choose between separate "best" models. This is true not only of time series analysis, but also of machine learning and, more broadly, statistics in general.

The two main methods we will use (for the time being) are the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (as we progress further with our articles on Bayesian Statistics).

Notice that we receive a convergence warning message. Notice also that R actually uses the arima0 function to calculate the AR model. As we'll learn in subsequent articles, AR(p) models are simply ARIMA(p, 0, 0) models, and thus an AR model is a special case of ARIMA with no Moving Average (MA) component.

In particular we note that the autoregressive model does not take into account volatility clustering, which leads to clustering of serial correlation in financial time series. When we consider the ARCH and GARCH models in later articles, we will account for this.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No specialpermission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. Forarticles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused withoutpermission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to

Fortunately, as new burials are discovered and old ones are re-analyzed, new patterns are emerging on the use of ornaments for children and young infants. Some recent articles argue that body ornaments found in certain infant burials were likely attached to a fixed object, possibly a blanket, or baby carrier or sling rather than being worn directly as personal ornaments by the young individuals (Henry-Gambier et al., 2019, p. 199; Laporte et al., 2021; Laporte & Dupont, 2019; Vang Petersen, 2016). In fact, recent research suggests that the need for baby carriers may have emerged as soon as hominins became bipedal (Langley & Suddendorf, 2020; Suddendorf et al., 2020; Taylor, 2010) and that early Homo mothers may have carried their infants to the front of their bodies to increase interaction (Nowell & Kurki, 2020). As Vang Petersen argues (2016), baby carriers were more than likely a common occurrence for prehistoric infants and young children due to the need for parents to remain mobile while taking care of their progeny. Recent functional investigations carried out on various sets of ornaments found in burials further support this interpretation, as they suggest that the use of ornaments in association with infants likely produced a sensorial experience beyond the visual (Rainio & Mannermaa, 2014). For example, based on use-wear and experimental analyses, 32 perforated wild boar (Sus scrofa) teeth found in the Skateholm burial of a woman buried with her newborn baby (Larsson, 1984, p. 20) were interpreted as rattling ornaments sewn on a baby pouch (Rainio & Tamboer, 2018). 041b061a72


bottom of page